Discrimination is a dirty word, and why shouldn't it be considering it's long standing history during The Civil Rights Movement. BUT nowadays Discrimination has been applied to situations that don't match the definition. Let's take a step back and examine what Discrimination is before we get into this article.
For the purpose of this article we're sticking to the 2nd definition because this is the realm where we find discrimination being used. Not too long ago there was a young boy who wanted to join the Girl Scouts, however the twist was this young boy identified himself as a girl. While some on the left might see this as Discrimination, those of us who are on the RIGHT side of the issues see this for what it is...EXCLUSIVITY! The title CLEARLY says GIRL scouts. The Girl Scouts is a privately funded organization and therefore are allowed to specify membership eligibility for specific genders, races, religious affiliation, ect. ect. Before we go on, let's look at Exclusive.
For the purpose of this article we'll have to focus on the 1st definition, specifically, incompatible. The boy is CLEARLY a boy but he desires to join The GIRL Scouts despite the fact that he is NOT a girl. Therefore by definition of the TITLE of Girl Scouts, he has NO grounds to request membership. And yet the parents of this BOY raise a stink when the Troop Leader doesn't allow HIM to join the Girl Scouts BASED on the fact that HE IS A BOY! In order to elaborate on the foolishness of this situation, this would
be like a Black Person trying to join an Asian exclusive organization
solely based on the fact that he has a deep seeded admiration of Asian
culture so much so that he identifies himself as an Asian. That's fine, cool, and dandy BUT YOU'RE NOT ASIAN! We would
clearly see the foolishness there, BUT because this is a child, our
heartstrings get tugged at and Woe be tied to he who makes a child FEEL
BAD. Give me a break...
Understand that I am NOT belittling the issue of this little boy, obviously he has a very deep seeded psychological disorder that causes him to think he is a girl and that issues needs to be treated NOT encouraged. But getting back to my point, Discrimination is being misused to be applied to ANY rejection of individuals REGARDLESS if it's a legitimate rejection or not.
Which brings me to the myth that is "Marriage Equality". If Homosexual Activists REALLY believed in "Marriage Equality" they'd affirm Polygamy, Pederasty, Incest, after all, why is it wrong for them to get married but okay for you ? We Christians don't have that problem, we believe in Marriage exclusivity, between an unrelated, of age Man & Woman (Race and Religious affiliation are not specified), although ideally one should marry someone who shares their religious affiliation, simply because a union of opposing world views can not survive a marriage. Based on OUR beliefs we have a reason to reject ANY idea of marriage outside of what God specified...however Homosexual Activists do not have such a standard to reject polygamy, pederasty and incest, and any attempt at doing so would be seen a bigotry and ignorance on their part...however they're unable to make that connection. So Homosexuals DON'T believe in "Marriage Equality", they believe in "Marriage Equality FOR THEM ONLY" which is really Marriage Exclusivity.
Welcome to The Copious Christian. co·pi·ous [koh-pee-uhs] adjective 1.large in quantity or number; abundant; plentiful: copious amounts of food. 2.having or yielding an abundant supply: a copious larder; a copious harvest. 3. exhibiting abundance or fullness, as of thoughts or words. This is a blog dedicated to defending and discussing the word of God against Nominal Christians, Atheists, and Political Correctness with Biblical support and general logic.
Showing posts with label Interracial Marriage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Interracial Marriage. Show all posts
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Monday, June 4, 2012
Interracial Marriage, Homosexuality and Pedophilia...
"One obvious contradiction in the
assimilationist position is that if homosexual identity is inborn, as they
say, then why do they oppose freedom of sexual expression for minors? Assimilationists
argue that sexual identity is fixed by age six, but they deny young people
the right to enjoy sexual pleasure with the person of their own choice.
For them, "protection" is the key word, not "liberation"; they call on
the state to "protect" young people from expressing and exploring their
own sexual behavior. They want to "protect" young people from "dirty old
men" (I, incidentally, am speaking as a "dirty [gay] old man" - something
I take as a positive goal), but in reality are protecting them from themselves.
They support criminalization of young people's sexuality, especially if
it involves sex with an adult man. They condemn any adult who helps a young
person to explore his or her sexuality. They are like parents - only worse,
because they pretend to offer a guide to the gay future." - David Thornstad
This was taken from the NAMBLA website. For those of you who don't know what NAMBLA is, they are The North American Man/Boy Love Association...essentially they're an organization of Pedophiles who seek to make pedophilia legal. The quote above is a VERY interesting part of an article I read that Christians have been saying for AGES however, Homosexuals and Gay Supporters alike have all but ignored the obvious implications of their position and leave it to a Pedophile to address them. So I figured seeing it directly from the horse's mouth would persuade them into realizing just how badly they screwed up.
Labels:
Homosexuality,
Interracial Marriage,
Marriage,
Pedophilia
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)